The
People’s Republic of China (PRC) has not acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty.
China continues to insist on a military requirement for antipersonnel mines at
the present time, while acknowledging the importance of a total prohibition from
a humanitarian point of view.
At the Third Annual Conference of States Parties to Amended Protocol II of
the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) in December 2001, Ambassador Sha
Zukang stated:
There are currently two major international legal instruments on landmines:
the amended Landmine Protocol...and the so-called Ottawa Convention... Both
instruments are aimed at reducing and eliminating threats to civilians posed by
APLs. They are complementary to each other. If we look at the issue exclusively
from the humanitarian perspective, the approach of a total ban adopted by the
Ottawa Convention is obviously the better of the two. Countries with a more
benign security environment and less dependence on APLs can certainly opt for
the Ottawa approach. We respect the sovereign choice by the states parties to
the Ottawa Convention. However, for those countries with a more complex security
environment and higher reliance on APLs thus unable to give up the right of the
legitimate use of APLs for the purpose of self-defense, the amended Landmine
Protocol becomes a natural choice. Striking an appropriate balance between
humanitarian concerns and security needs, the amended Protocol attempts to
address the humanitarian concerns through restrictions on the use of APLs and
strengthened post-war demining efforts. It is fair to say that the two legal
instruments share the same
objectives.[1]
In September 2001, China did not participate as an observer in the Third
Meeting of States Parties. It did, however, participate in some of the Mine Ban
Treaty intersessional Standing Committee meetings in January and May 2002.
China was one of the nineteen states to abstain from voting on pro-ban treaty UN
General Assembly Resolution 26/54M in November 2001.
On 4 November 1998, China ratified CCW Amended Protocol II and indicated it
would exercise the optional nine-year deferral period for compliance with key
restrictions.Atthe Second Review Conference of States Parties
to the CCW in December 2001, China strongly opposedthe proposal for
an antivehicle landmine (AVL) protocol: “Further restriction on use of
AVLs might help reduce the accidental civilian casualties caused by such
weapons. However, we should recognize that the AVL is a crucial and
irreplaceable means of national defense for many countries, including China. Any
inappropriate restrictions on the use of AVLs may be detrimental to the security
interests of those countries, which in itself runs counter to the basic spirit
of humanitarianism.”[2]
China submitted its national annual report as required under Article 13 of
Amended Protocol II. China also produced a documentary film entitled
“China in Action” to provide an introduction to China’s
implementation of the Protocol for distribution to interested delegations upon
request.[3]
PRODUCTION
China is known as one of the world's largest
producers of antipersonnel mines. China North Industries Corporation (NORINCO)
and Chinese State Arsenals have been producing approximately twenty-two types of
antipersonnel mines, six of which are based on Soviet designs and the rest of
which are Chinese.[4]
China reported that since 1997, it has ceased the production of antipersonnel
mines without a self-destruct capabilityand, “Since 1999, China
has stipulated that all the new APLs under research, development and
manufacturing should have self-deactivation
capability.”[5] China
also reported to have issued a document, “The Functional Requirements of
Anti-Personnel Landmines of PLA in Compliance with Protocol II,”
containing the requirements for the new production of antipersonnel landmines:
“...the newly produced mines should be detectable to the extent that the
mines should provide a response signal equivalent to a signal from eight grammes
or more of iron in a single coherent mass with common-available
mine-detectors.”[6]
The 2001 Article 13 Report did not report on mines produced before 1997, and
whether they were destroyed or whether 8 grammes of metal were added. Following
a request from Landmine Monitor to clarify this point, the Chinese Ministry of
Foreign Affairs responded, “As illustrated in our national report to the
3rd Annual Conference of States Parties to the Landmine Protocol of
the CCW last December, the Chinese Government has been consistently complying
with the Protocol and made great efforts in executing its
obligations.”[7]
TRANSFER
In the past China was one of the world's largest
exporters of antipersonnel mines. On 22 April 1996, the government of China
declared a moratorium on the export of antipersonnel mines that are incompatible
with Protocol II requirements. China’s commitment was re-affirmed by
Ambassador Sha Zukang in his statement to the Third Annual Conference of States
Parties to the CCW Amended Protocol II: “Since April 1996, China has
faithfully abided by its commitment to a moratorium on the export of APLs
incompatible with the technical specifications contained in the amended Landmine
Protocol.”[8] Landmine
Monitor is unaware of exports of any Chinese antipersonnel mines of any type
since that time.
STOCKPILING
China is believed to have the largest
antipersonnel mine stockpile in the world. Based on interviews with non-Chinese
government officials involved in Protocol II discussions, Landmine Monitor has
estimated the Chinese antipersonnel mine stockpile at 110 million, including
perhaps 100 million Type 72 mines.
In late 1999 China reported that it had destroyed over 1.7 million old-type
antipersonnel mines.[9]
China’s December 2000 and December 2001 Article 13 reports did not mention
any updated figures. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs has never responded
to Landmine Monitor requests for clarification on the number of antipersonnel
mines in stockpiles. China attended the regional stockpile destruction seminar
held in Malaysia in August 2001.
LANDMINE PROBLEM AND CLEARANCE
China has used antipersonnel mines along its
borders with Russia, India, and Vietnam, planting an estimated ten million mines
along these borders over the
years.[10] The government
states, “China is not a country seriously affected by
mines.”[11] After major
clearance operations from 1992-1999, China maintains that the “mine threat
on the Chinese side along the Sino-Vietnamese border has been basically
removed.”[12] The danger
to civilians from mines laid along China's borders with India and Russia is
reportedly minimal due to the sparsely populated or mountainous
terrain.[13] However, China
reported problems with other unexploded ordnance: “Today, a large number
of unexploded ordnance left over from World War II remains on the Chinese
territory, posing serious threats to the lives and property of local
people.”[14]
China reported that no mine clearance activities have been conducted since
1999, when China completed clearance of its border with Vietnam,
“basically resolving the mine problem within its
territory.”[15] For some
minefields, covering a total of 20-30 million square meters, China decided to
mark and “seal” the areas instead of clearing
them.[16]
MINE ACTION
China has contributed to international
humanitarian mine clearance efforts since 1998. China donated $100,000 to Bosnia
and Herzegovina through the UN Voluntary Trust Fund for assistance in mine
clearance for the period 1999 to 2000; in addition it sponsored two
international mine clearance training courses in
China.[17]
In 2001, China donated mine detecting and clearing equipment worth $1,260,000
to seven mine-affected countries including Angola, Cambodia, Eritrea, Ethiopia,
Mozambique, Namibia, and
Rwanda.[18] The donated
equipment was used in the post-war mine clearance operations in border areas in
Yunnan and Guangxi provinces from 1992 to 1999, and includes mine detectors,
minesweeping blasting cartridges, rocket blasting devices, and personal demining
protective equipment.[19] In
2001, the Chinese government sent a delegation of government officials and
demining experts to Eritrea for on-site demonstration of, and training in, the
use of China’s demining
equipment.[20] The delegation
also conducted a survey on the local landmine
problem.[21] At the Third
Annual Conference of States Parties to the CCW Amended Protocol II in December
2001, China offered “to conduct cooperation and exchanges with interested
countries and international organizations in the field of demining assistance,
so as to make further contributions to international demining
efforts.”[22]
LANDMINE CASUALTIES
Although the government of China is believed to be
collecting information on landmine casualties, no comprehensive data is
available.[23] In February
2001, Landmine Monitor conducted a field survey in the provinces of Guangxi and
Yunnan, both bordering Vietnam. The survey found that most mine incidents
occurred in the late 1970s and early 1980s. In Guangxi, three counties were
surveyed and 359 mine casualties identified. No new mine casualties had been
reported in these counties since 1996. In Yunnan Province, Landmine Monitor
surveyed Wenshan Prefecture, and 5,310 mine casualties were identified,
including 3,811 survivors. The latest recorded mine incident occurred in
September 2000.[24]
The China Disabled Person’s Federation (CDPF) in Beijing did not
approve a planned field survey in 2002 by Landmine Monitor to Honghe and Simao
in Yunnan Province. However, a report was provided by the local CDPFs in Honghe
and Simao. The Simao CDPF did not collect any data on mine casualties as few
people were affected by
landmines.[25] In Honghe
prefecture, Landmine Monitor received information from the Jinping, Luchun and
Hekou CDPFs, although the information was
incomplete.[26]
The Jinping CDPF report identified twelve landmine survivors, who needed
either new or replacement
prostheses.[27] The report from
the Luchun CDPF identified ten landmine survivors, who needed either new or
replacement prostheses.[28] In
the Hekou Yao ethnic minority autonomic county, the CDPF identified 15 landmine
survivors, in a total population of 1,133, who needed new or replacement
prostheses.[29] The majority of
survivors identified were farmers.
SURVIVOR ASSISTANCE, DISABILITY POLICY AND PRACTICE
As a result of the field survey conducted in
February 2001, information is available on survivor assistance programs in some
mine-affected areas in Guangxi and Yunnan provinces. Adequate assistance is
problematic as the mine-affected areas are a relatively long distance from
medical and rehabilitation
facilities.[30]
China’s December 2000 Protocol II report included for the first time a
section on Rehabilitation and Relief of Civilians Accidentally Injured by
Landmines. The section reported the measures undertaken by the Chinese
government to assist, rehabilitate, and relieve civilians injured by landmines
during and after the conflict with
Vietnam.[31]
[1] Statement by Ambassador Sha Zukang at
the Third Annual Conference of States Parties to CCW Amended Protocol II,
Geneva, 10 December 2001, p. 1. [2]
Statement by Ambassador Sha Zukang at the CCW Second Review Conference of States
Parties, Geneva, 11 December 2001, pp.
3-4. [3] Statement to Third Annual
Conference of CCW Amended Protocol II, 10 December 2001, p.
2. [4] For additional details see
Landmine Monitor Report 1999, pp.
457-458. [5] Article 13 Report, 10
December 2001, p. 5. [6] Ibid., p.
4. [7] Email from Zhao Li, Department of
Arms Control and Disarmament, 13 March
2002. [8] Statement to the Third Annual
Conference of CCW Amended Protocol II, 10 December 2001, p.
2. [9] Article 13 Report, October
1999. [10] US Department of State,
“Hidden Killers 1994,” p. 18 and “Hidden Killers 1998,”
Table A-1. [11] Foreign Affairs Office
of the Ministry of National Defense, People’s Republic of China, Postwar
Demining Operations in China (1992-1999), December 1999, p.
1. [12] Ministry of National Defense,
Postwar Demining Operations in China, December 1999, p. 11. Before the clearance
operations, landmines posed a threat to civilians in the border areas with
Vietnam, where there were more than 560 minefields covering an area of over 300
square kilometers. [13] US Department of
State, “Hidden Killers 1994,” p.
18. [14] Statement to the Second Review
Conference of CCW, Geneva, 11 December 2001, p.
2. [15] Article 13 Report, 10 December
2001, p. 3. See also Landmine Monitor Report 2000, p. 485. China uses four
different mine clearance methods: destruction by burning, used in areas with
dense vegetation; blast demining in minefields far away from populated areas and
arsenals; mechanical demining, featuring low cost, high speed and less
casualties, but with restrictions of the topology; and manual detection and
clearance adopted together with other demining means. Article 13 Report, p. 9.
Demining equipment used in its post-war demining operations in the 1990s
includes GBP123 rocket-blasting devices, GBP114 mine-clearance blasting
cartridges, GTL115 mine detectors, fork mine ploughs, flail demining vehicles,
mine-sifting vehicles, and water-canon demining devices. China, Article 13
Report, 10 December 2001, p. 10. Chinese commercial mine clearance equipment
companies include China North Industries Group, and Geo-Equipment Corporation,
in Beijing and the 50th Research Institute, Ministry of Information Industry, in
Shanghai. [16] Ministry of National
Defense, Postwar Demining Operations in China, December 1999, p. 5.
[17] For more details, Landmine Monitor
Report 2000, p. 485. [18] Article 13
Report, 10 December 2001, p 7. [19]
Ibid. [20] Statement of the Third Annual
Conference of CCW Amended Protocol II, 10 December 2001, p.
2. [21]
Ibid. [22]
Ibid. [23] See Landmine Monitor Report
2000, p. 486. [24] See Landmine Monitor
Report 2001, pp. 530-531. [25] Telephone
interview with Yunnan Provincial CDPF, February 2002.
[26] Details on the survivors were
provided in the reports. [27] Report by
the CDPF (China Disabled People’s Federation) of Jinping Miao, Yao, Dai
ethnic minority autonomic county, 29 March
2002. [28] Report by the CDPF (China
Disabled People’s Federation) of Lu Chen, 28 March
2002. [29] CDPF Hekou Yao, “Report
on disabled people affected by mines in Hekou Yao, Yunnan Province,” March
2002. [30] See Landmine Monitor Report
2001, pp. 531-533. [31] Ibid., p.
533.