Key developments since May 2005: Morocco voted in favor of the annual
UN General Assembly resolution supporting the Mine Ban Treaty for the second
consecutive year. It announced at the Sixth Meeting of States Parties its
intent to submit a voluntary Article 7 transparency report. Between April 2005
and April 2006, 289 mines and items of unexploded ordnance were marked and 7,074
items of explosive ordnance, mostly Polisario’s stockpiled antipersonnel
mines, were destroyed. In 2005, there were at least nine new casualties.
Mine Ban Policy
The Kingdom of Morocco has not acceded to the Mine Ban Treaty. In November
2005, a representative stated, “Though not yet party to the Convention,
Morocco has, since the launching of the Ottawa process, fully subscribed to the
founding and noble principles of the Convention and to its laudable humanitarian
objectives.”[1] However,
Morocco continued to cite resolution of the territorial dispute over Western
Sahara as the obstacle to its accession: “Formal adherence to the Ottawa
Convention is a strategic objective. The achievement of this objective is
intimately linked to the preservation of its territorial integrity and to the
protection of its national security. This provisional impediment will disappear
as soon as a final and mutually acceptable political solution is achieved to the
artificial conflict
imposed.”[2]
On 8 December 2005, Morocco voted in favor of UN General Assembly Resolution
60/80 calling for universalization and full implementation of the Mine Ban
Treaty.[3] It noted, “For the
second consecutive year, Morocco voted in favor of the UNGA resolution on
antipersonnel mines. This vote represents a departure from Morocco’s
previous stand on the issue of antipersonnel mines and expresses, in a clear and
an unambiguous manner, Morocco’s total adherence to the founding
principles and the humanitarian values underlying the Convention. It most of
all demonstrates a genuine desire to contribute towards universalizing the
Convention.”[4]
Morocco attended as an observer the Sixth Meeting of States Parties to the
Mine Ban Treaty in Zagreb, Croatia in November-December 2005, as well as the
meetings of the intersessional Standing Committees in June 2005 and May
2006.
Morocco announced in November 2005 that it will submit a voluntary Article 7
transparency report in the near future. It stated, “In view of achieving
a closer interaction with the Convention’s mechanism and illustrating
further its commitment to the principles and objectives underlying it, Morocco
has decided to submit, in the near future and on a voluntary basis, its first
national report on the implementation of the
Convention.”[5]
Morocco is party to the Convention on Conventional Weapons and its Amended
Protocol II on landmines. It submitted an annual national report required by
Article 13 in November 2003 and submitted a summary sheet indicating no changes
in November of 2004 and 2005. Morocco attended the Seventh Meeting of States
Parties to Amended Protocol II in Geneva in November 2005.
Production, Transfer, Stockpiling and Use
Morocco has said on several occasions that it never produced or exported
antipersonnel mines, and that it stopped importing them prior to the entry into
force of the Mine Ban Treaty in March
1999.[6] In November 2005, a
representative reiterated, “Indeed, my country is not only among the few
states that never produced or exported antipersonnel mines, but it also
refrained from importing these murderous devices well before the entry into
force of the Ottawa
Convention.”[7]
Morocco also said in November 2005, “The only antipersonnel mines
retained are used for the sole purpose of instruction in demining techniques and
training of the Moroccan contingents taking part in various peacekeeping
operations around the world.”[8] It made similar statements about having a stockpile of mines solely for
training purposes in November 2004 and September
2005.[9] It has not provided any
details on types or quantities of mines. Morocco previously stated in 2001 and
2002 that it had no stockpile of antipersonnel
mines.[10]
Morocco told Landmine Monitor that it stopped using antipersonnel mines at
the time of the Western Sahara cease-fire in
1991.[11] Morocco has acknowledged
extensive use of mines in the past, most notably in the earthen berms (walls) it
built from 1982 to 1987 to secure the northwest corner of Western Sahara. Since
Landmine Monitor starting reporting in 1999 it has not found any independent
evidence of antipersonnel mine use by Moroccan forces. The Polisario in Western
Sahara have alleged Moroccan use several times, but there were no such
allegations in 2005 or 2006.
Landmine and UXO Problem
Morocco is not considered mine-affected, except for the territory it controls
in Western Sahara. Western Sahara is affected by mines and unexploded ordnance
(UXO),[12] as a result of years of
colonial and post-colonial conflicts. The 1991 cease-fire resulted in a
territory divided between the Polisario-controlled area and Morocco by 2,400
kilometers of defensive walls built by Morocco, known as berms (earthen walls of
about three meters in height), which it fortified with antipersonnel and
antivehicle mines.[13] There are
also berms in the Moroccan-controlled zone, around Dakhla and stretching from
Boujdour, including Smara on the Moroccan
border.[14]
Approximately 10,000 Saharawi nomads live in mine-affected areas on both
sides of the Moroccan berms.[15] Landmines and UXO in Western Sahara are also a serious threat to illegal
immigrants attempting to enter Melilla, the Spanish enclave on the Moroccan
coast. If caught by the Moroccan security forces, they are reportedly sent back
to the berms and told to walk straight through, without stepping left or right,
across the minefields.[16]
Mine Action Program
There is no formal mine action program in Morocco or in Western Sahara.
However, under bilateral military agreements signed by Morocco and Polisario in
early 1999, both parties agreed to cooperate with the UN Mission for the
Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) in the exchange of mine-related
information, marking of mined areas, and the clearance and destruction of mines
and UXO in the presence of MINURSO
observers.[17] This agreement does
not cover minefields along the
berms.[18]
Demining
MINURSO carries out joint military operations with Polisario forces in
territory on the Western Sahara side of the berms and with the Royal Moroccan
Army (RMA) on the Moroccan side. When mines and UXO are discovered, MINURSO
marks them and then monitors their destruction by Polisario or RMA’s
explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) teams. MINURSO has reported that while the
RMA has the capacity to address some UXO issues in the areas it controls, no
survey or clearance has been conducted by Polisario in areas east of the
berm.[19]
Identification and Marking/Fencing of Mined Areas
No survey has been conducted in Morocco. Polisario provided MINURSO with all
maps and necessary information in 1991, but Morocco did
not.[20]
As part of its activities, MINURSO marks locations of mines and UXO with
piles of stones up to half-a-meter in height, painted red. In May 2006, MINURSO
planned to manufacture 450 standard mine and UXO warning
signs.[21]
Mine and UXO Clearance
Between October 2005 and April 2006, MINURSO discovered and marked 29 mines
and UXO, and monitored the destruction of 3,381 antipersonnel mines. This
included the destruction by Polisario of 3,100 stockpiled antipersonnel mines on
27 February 2006, as well as another 281 stockpiled antipersonnel mines during a
destruction trial the day before. Between April and October 2005, MINURSO
discovered and marked 260 mines and UXO, and monitored the destruction of 3,693
mines and UXO. During the same period, MINURSO also monitored 40 EOD operations
on the west side of the berm, carried out by the
RMA.[22] The data reported did not
indicate what quantities were found and destroyed on each side of the berm.
Reporting in past years by MINURSO has been inconsistent in format, but
Landmine Monitor has recorded a total of 1,294 hazardous items marked, 831 sites
marked and the monitoring of the destruction of 37,629 mines and UXO since
1999.[23] MINURSO has not
disaggregated data between mines and UXO.
Mine Risk Education
In March 2006, the Moroccan Association of Mine Victims presented a mine
risk education proposal to the local council on human rights in Smara. It had
previously been in discussions with the Moroccan Red Cross and health and
agriculture delegations in the
region.[24]
Landmine/UXO Casualties
In 2005, there were at least nine new mine/UXO casualties, including five
killed and four injured. The Swiss Foundation for Landmine Victim Aid (SFLVA)
recorded eight casualties, including four people killed in Assa Zag and Tan Tan
provinces. Four of the casualties were under 18 years and one casualty was 18
years old.[25] Additionally, one
man died in an antipersonnel mine incident in the Moroccan-controlled part of
Western Sahara.[26]
In 2004, Moroccan officials interviewed by Landmine Monitor were not aware of
any new mine casualties.[27] No
mine casualties were reported in 2003. However, SFLVA was approached by the
families of two landmine survivors injured in 2004 and 2003. In 2004, a young
girl was playing in the fields when she was injured by a landmine near Twizgui,
Assa Zag province in southern Morocco on the border with Moroccan-controlled
Western Sahara. In 2003, a young woman was injured outside her tent, which was
put up in a pasture in Ibouirat, Assa Zag
province.[28]
Casualties continued to be reported in 2006. MINURSO recorded two casualties
in the Moroccan-controlled part of Western Sahara: on 12 February, a Moroccan
soldier was killed on patrol; on 19 February, a Bedouin was killed while driving
a truck.[29]
No comprehensive information is available on mine casualties in Morocco and
the total number of casualties is not known. However, during a training
workshop organized by the UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) in
April 2006, Morocco stated it had an electronic database of casualties. In
addition to the workshop, UNIDIR sent out a general questionnaire on the
provision of victim assistance, both immediate and longer-term rehabilitation,
to the six North African states in its project, including
Morocco.[30] Between March 2000 and
March 2001, Moroccan authorities registered 51 military mine/UXO casualties
(seven killed and 44 injured) in Western
Sahara.[31]
In 2006, as a result of being approached by the families of two mine
survivors, SFLVA conducted a survey in Assa Zag and Tan Tan provinces, in
cooperation with a local partner. As of 25 May, SFLVA had found 38 mine/UXO
casualties, including 28 survivors in these two provinces. Many of them were
children, injured while playing or herding cattle. The major cause was
landmines, but there were some casualties due to UXO incidents. The data
collected does not reflect the entire scope of the problem, as only two
provinces were surveyed and it is possible that not all fatal casualties were
recorded.[32]
Reportedly, the Moroccan Association of Mine Victims in Smara,
Moroccan-controlled Western Sahara, has collected information on 70 mine
casualties, including 37
killed.[33]
Survivor Assistance
At the Sixth Meeting of States Parties, Morocco stated that it cared for mine
casualties, in particular for their socioeconomic conditions and that it
“remained particularly sensitive to the sufferings caused by these
indiscriminate weapons and their impact on the socioeconomic conditions of the
victims, whose number is still increasing in an alarming
way.”[34]
Mine survivors are reportedly not treated differently from other people with
disabilities.[35]The Moroccan
health system is generally well developed and well run in cities, but in rural
or desert areas, distances are long and services less developed. Mine survivors
do not always have access to the necessary treatment, for financial reasons or
because of the lack of specialized care in certain
areas.[36] On the Moroccan side of
the berm in Western Sahara, there is a medical center in Laayoune and two
medical stations in Awsard and
Smara.[37]
In early 2005, the Swiss Foundation for Landmine Victim Aid was approached by
the families of two mine survivors who could not afford necessary treatment. It
financially supported medical expertise, transport and accompaniment of a family
member to a hospital in Rabat for a young girl injured by a mine in 2004. The
Moroccan government covered the cost of the medical treatment after the media
reported on the case. Reportedly, the girl had not received surgery since the
incident occurred and the family was only able to afford basic treatment. The
Swiss Foundation has continued to provide transportation for checkups and
prosthesis adjustment. Also in 2005, SFLVA covered all the costs for transport,
surgery and accompaniment for the young woman who was injured in
2003.[38]
The organization S.O.S Physical Handicap Morocco (S.O.S Handicap Moteur
Maroc) runs a rehabilitation center in Tanger, providing artificial limbs and
socioeconomic reintegration programs. Horizon Association of the Disabled
(Association Horizon des Handicapés) manages a physical rehabilitation
and socioeconomic reintegration center in Ouarzazate, employing 36 disabled
staff out of 45. Other organizations providing medical, physical
rehabilitation, socioeconomic and psychosocial services for persons with
disabilities are the Moroccan Foundation for the Development of the Disabled
(Fondation Marocaine pour le Développement de l’Handicapé)
and the Support Organization for the Community-Based Rehabilitation Program
(Association d’Appui au Programme de Réadaptation à Base
Communautaire).
In January 2006, the Moroccan Organization of Persons with Disabilities
(l’Amicale Marocaine des Handicapés) received a donation of 1,133
wheelchairs and 110 sports wheelchairs from the US-based Wheelchair Foundation
and Rotary International. This was the third such delivery through a program of
support between the organizations; Morocco is scheduled to receive a new load of
wheelchairs every five
years.[39]
In 2005, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) Special Fund for
the Disabled (SFD) organized two workshops on the manufacturing of polypropylene
prostheses together with the Centre FORMA in Marrakech; 23 people participated.
SFD is building Centre FORMA’s capacity to run this type of workshop and
obtain polypropylene components without external support; to support this, one
technician was sent on a one-month training course at the SFD regional center in
Addis Ababa.[40] The SFD also worked
with the Ministry of Health to remedy low patient satisfaction, low production
and high cost of services at the Regional Rehabilitation and Orthopedic Center
– Oued Nachef (Centre Régional de Rééducation et
d’Orthopédie Oued Nachef) in
Oudja.[41]
Handicap International (HI) has supported Moroccan disability organizations,
NGOs and government institutions with technical advice, training (including for
orthopedic technicians) and networking to promote the full integration of people
with disabilities. HI also plans to stimulate the exchange of reintegration
experiences between Algeria, Tunisia and
Morocco.[42]
On 30 April 2006, the Royal Moroccan Federation for Sports for Persons with
Disabilities (Fédération Royale Marocaine des Sports pour
Personnes Handicapées, FRMSPH) launched the “Football for
All” project in partnership with Handicap International, and with the
financial support of the Fédération Internationale de Football
Association (FIFA). The project aims to promote football for persons with
disabilities to encourage social integration and personal
development.[43]
Since 2005, the Moroccan Association of Mine Victims active in Smara,
Moroccan-controlled Western Sahara, has collected casualty information, raised
awareness on the rights of mine survivors and advocated for their reintegration
into society in cooperation with other organizations. However, the organization
has not had the funds to implement reintegration and assistance
projects.[44]
Disability Policy and Practice
The Secretary of State for Family, Childhood and Disabled People
(Secrétariat de l’Etat Chargé de la Famille, de
l’Enfance et des Personnes Handicapées), under the Ministry of
Social Affairs, deals with disability issues. Morocco has no specific
legislation to protect the rights of people with disabilities, but there are
guidelines without legal effect.[45] However, this legislative vacuum leaves many issues unaddressed,
especially when it comes to
employment.[46]
In September 2004, the Secretary of State for Family, Childhood and Disabled
People, with the technical advice of the Research Center for the Study and
Documentation of the Health Economy (Centre de Recherche, d’Etude et de
Documentation en Economie de la Santé, CREDES) and Handicap
International, launched a disability census in Morocco. The census results were
presented on 14 December 2005 during a national seminar, and concluded that
about five percent of the population has a disability. The survey found that
only 12 percent of persons with disabilities received social welfare; of those,
only 11 percent could cover their expenses. Only 32 percent of disabled
children between four and 15 years old went to school, and only 12 percent of
disabled people between 15 and 60 years of age, capable of working, were
employed. The census was the first step toward creating a new national action
plan in 2006; the first national workshop on developing the action plan was held
from 27 to 28 January 2006.[47]
[1] Statement by Zohour Alaoui,
Director of UN and International Organizations Department, Ministry of Foreign
Affairs and Cooperation, Sixth Meeting of States Parties, Zagreb, 28 November
2005, p. 1. [2] Ibid, p. 3. [3] Morocco also provided an
explanation of its vote on the draft resolution in the UNGA First Committee
(Disarmament) on 28 October 2005. It is similar in content to its subsequent
statement in Zagreb in late November 2005. [4] Statement by Zohour Alaoui,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation, Sixth Meeting of States Parties,
Zagreb, 28 November 2005, p. 2. Translation by Landmine Monitor. [5] Ibid. [6] See Landmine Monitor Report
2005, pp. 823-824. [7] Statement by Zohour Alaoui,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation, Sixth Meeting of States Parties,
Zagreb, 28 November 2005, p. 1. In its statement to the First Review Conference
of the Mine Ban Treaty on 3 December 2004, Morocco included a claim that it has
also not used antipersonnel mines since the entry into force of the treaty.
Morocco first claimed in February 2001 that it does not use, produce, import or
stockpile antipersonnel mines, and has repeated that on several occasions. See
Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 1071. [8] Statement by Zohour Alaoui,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation, Sixth Meeting of States Parties,
Zagreb, 28 November 2005, p. 1. [9] See Landmine Monitor Report
2005, p. 824. [10] See Landmine Monitor Report
2004, p. 1071. Landmine Monitor has sought, but not received, clarification on
when Morocco stopped stockpiling mines for operational purposes, and whether
stocks were intentionally destroyed or depleted through use. [11] Morocco response to Landmine
Monitor Questionnaire, 16 September 2005. [12] Under Protocol V to the
Convention on Conventional Weapons, explosive remnants of war are defined as
unexploded ordnance and abandoned explosive ordnance. Mines are explicitly
excluded from the definition. A field assessment undertaken by the NGO Landmine
Action UK found only a threat from mines and UXO. However, as no comprehensive
survey has been undertaken so far in Western Sahara, Landmine Action UK has
reported that it is too early to determine whether contamination includes
abandoned explosive ordnance. Email from Simon Conway, Director, Landmine
Action UK, 29 May 2006. [13] See Landmine Monitor Report
1999, pp. 921-924. [14] Email from Simon Conway,
Landmine Action UK, 3 May 2006. [15] Interview with Maj. M.
Morrow, Mine Information Officer, MINURSO, Laayoune, 7 January 2001. [16] Email from Simon Conway,
Landmine Action UK, 3 May 2006. [17] Military agreement No. 3 on
the reduction of hazards from mines and UXO, 12 March 1999. [18] See Landmine Monitor Report
2004, pp. 1072, 1241. [19] UN Mine Action Service
(UNMAS), “Mission Report, MINURSO visit,” New York, November 2005,
p. 1. [20] Presentation on Western
Sahara by Geneva Call, Standing Committee meetings, Geneva, 10 May 2006;
Polisario response to Landmine Monitor, 27 June 2002. [21] Email from Maj. Sherif
El-Desouky, Mine Action Coordinator, MINURSO, Laayoune, 20 May 2006. [22] “Report of the UN
Secretary-General on the situation concerning Western Sahara,” S/2006/249,
19 April 2006,
p. 3; email from Maj. Sherif El-Desouky, MINURSO, Laayoune, 20 May 2006. [23] As compiled from MINURSO
reports by Landmine Monitor: 2005 (354 mines and UXO marked); 2004 (172 mines
and UXO marked); 2001 (831 sites of mines and UXO marked; 37,328 antipersonnel
mines destroyed, as well as 3,000 antivehicle mines and 27,000 UXO); 2000 (766
mines and UXO marked, of which 301 mines and UXO were destroyed). [24] Mohammed al-Moutaki,
“Citizens deplore the lack of assistance to mine victims in Smara,”
al-Ahdat al-Maghribiyya (Smara), www.ahdath.info, 27 April 2006. [25] Email from Fanja
Rasolomanana, Project Coordinator, SFLVA, 26 May 2006. [26] “Statistics For
Discovered & Destroyed UXOs/Mines: The Period from Jul 2003 to Jul
2005,” sent by Enrico Magnani, MINURSO, Laayoune, 7 September 2005;
Saharawi Campaign to Ban Landmines (SCBL) extract of the Mine Victim Statistics
Database, Rabouni (Tindouf), accessed 31 March 2006. [27] Interview with Seham
Lemrabet, Permanent Mission of Morocco to the UN in Geneva, 25 June 2004;
interview with Amb. Omar Hilale, Permanent Mission of Morocco to the UN in
Geneva, Nairobi, 3 December 2004. [28] Email from Fanja
Rasolomanana, SFLVA, 26 May 2006. [29] Email from Maj. Sherif
El-Desouky, MINURSO, 5 May 2006. [30] Email from Rosy Cave, Lead
Researcher for Explosive Remnants of War, UNIDIR, 4 May 2006. [31] For more information, see
Landmine Monitor Report 2004, p. 1072. [32] Email from Fanja
Rasolomanana, SFLVA, 26 May 2006. [33] Mohammed al-Moutaki,
“Citizens deplore the lack of assistance to mine victims in Smara,”
al-Ahdat al-Maghribiyya (Smara), 27 April 2006. [34] Statement by Morocco, Sixth
Meeting of States Parties, Zagreb, Croatia, 28 November-2 December 2005. [35] See Landmine Monitor Report
2004, p. 1072. [36] Email from Fanja
Rasolomanana, SFLVA, 26 May 2006. [37] UN Mission for the
Referendum in Western Sahara,
www.minurso.unlb.org, accessed 1 May 2006. [38] Email from Fanja
Rasolomanana, SFLVA, 26 May 2006. It was mistakenly reported that the girl was
from Western Sahara; see “Nouvelles hebdomadaires du Western Sahara:
Territoires occupées et sud Maroc,” Western Sahara Referendum
Support Association, 10 April 2005. [39] “Distribution
d’un lot de fauteuils roulants” (“Distribution of a batch of
wheelchairs”), Tanmia - Portal of the development community in Morocco,
www.tanmia.ma, 4 January 2006, accessed 1 May 2006. [40] ICRC, “Special Fund
for the Disabled Annual Report 2005,” Geneva, 10 March 2006, p. 17. [41] Ibid. [42] Email from Nicolas Bordet,
Regional Director, HI, Rabat, Morocco, 21 May 2006. [43] Press Advisory, “Pour
la promotion du handifoot,” (“For the promotion of
handifoot”), Tanmia - Portal of the development community in Morocco,
www.tanmia.ma, 28 April 2006. [44] Mohammed al-Moutaki,
“Citizens deplore the lack of assistance to mine victims in Smara,”
al-Ahdat al-Maghribiyya (Smara), 27 April 2006. [45] US Department of State,
“Country Reports on Human Rights Practices-2005: Morocco,”
Washington DC, 8 March 2006. [46] “Personnes
Handicapées: une intégration inachevée,”
(“People with disabilities; incomplete integration”), Tanmia -
Portal of the development community in Morocco, www.tanmia.ma, 2 December
2005. [47] Secrétariat de
l’Etat Chargé de la Famille, de l’Enfance et des Personnes
Handicapées, “Enquête National sur le Handicap,”
December 2005, www.sefsas.gov.ma,
accessed 3 May 2006.